Type to search

Comparing Stereo Recording Techniques: XY vs. ORTF

Share

Stereo recording techniques play a significant role in capturing sound with depth, dimension, and a sense of space. Among the many approaches, two of the most popular configurations are XY and ORTF. While both are effective in creating a stereo image, they each have unique characteristics that make them suitable for different scenarios.

This guide will explore the nuances of XY vs ORTF techniques, helping you understand which might be better suited to your needs and music technology preferences.


What is the Difference Between XY and ORTF?

Comparing Stereo Recording Techniques: XY vs. ORTF

The XY vs ORTF techniques differ mainly in their microphone placement, the way they pick up sound, and the resulting image.

In an XY setup, two identical cardioid mics are positioned close together with their capsules almost touching and angled outward at around 90 degrees in an off-axis. This configuration ensures that waves hit both mics at nearly the same time, resulting in no phase differences between the channels. Because of this, the image produced is precise and clear, but not very wide. It’s a coincident technique, meaning the microphones occupy the same point in space, which is advantageous for maintaining phase coherence when folding the recording down to mono.

On the other hand, ORTF involves placing two mics 17 cm apart and angled at 110 degrees. This distance creates a slight time delay between the two channels, introducing small phase differences. The result is a more spacious and natural image that captures a sense of depth and room ambiance. Unlike XY, ORTF is a near-coincident technique, where the mics are still close but not as tightly positioned. This provides a broader stereo spread, making it ideal for capturing the ambiance of a room or an ensemble, but it can lead to minor phase issues when converted to mono.


XY

Comparing Stereo Recording Techniques: XY vs. ORTF

The XY involves placing two identical mics close to each other, with their diaphragms almost touching. The mics are angled outward at 90 degrees or more, pointing away from each other like an off-axis. This ensures that the sound arrives at both mics at the same time, which makes it a coincident method.

Because of this arrangement, there is no phase difference between the channels, resulting in a clear and precise record that’s pleasing to the ears. This makes XY ideal for situations where maintaining phase coherence is crucial, such as when mixing the audio with other sources.

Characteristics of XY

One of the defining features of the XY configuration is its accurate imaging with minimal phase issues. The sound captured is very direct, and the stereo effect is not overly wide. This can be advantageous in situations where a narrower, more focused audio is desired. 

However, because the mics are positioned closely, the stereo separation can sometimes feel limited. While this might not be ideal for capturing the spaciousness of a large ensemble or natural environment, it works exceptionally well for smaller, more intimate sources. The overall tone tends to be clean and balanced, making it suitable for an instrument like a guitar, vocals, and close-miked performances with a bit of bass.

When to Use XY Recording?

The XY method is particularly effective for solo performances, small ensembles, and scenarios where spacing is a bit limited and bass is needed. It is also commonly used in live situations where clear imaging is needed without excessive width.

Additionally, the absence of phase issues makes it a reliable choice for scenarios where the recording might need to be folded down to mono without any artifacts. The compact setup of XY pairs is also a practical advantage, as it can easily be mounted on a single microphone stand, making it portable and easy to use.

What Instruments can XY Pick Up?

The XY method is versatile and can be used to capture a wide range of instruments, especially those that benefit from focused and balanced imaging. A solo acoustic instrument like a guitar or piano as well as string ensembles work with XY because the method captures a natural blend of direct sound and room ambiance. Drums can also be recorded with XY, particularly in live settings where phase issues need to be minimized, but the stereo spread might not be as wide as a spaced pair configuration.

XY is effective for close-miking instruments where a tight, coherent sound is essential. Aside from flawlessly miking solo instruments such as a piano or violin, it also handles bass frequencies well, offering clear and direct reproduction without muddying the mix. Bass instruments would benefit well from this method as it minimizes excessive reverb so you won’t need to worry about your mix or speakers sounding muddied even when you are close-miking to the source.

This makes it less ideal for capturing large rooms but excellent for more controlled environments. When played back over speakers, the imaging from an XY remains clear and stable, ensuring that all elements are properly localized in the mix and you can definitely hear this with your own ears.


ORTF

Comparing Stereo Recording Techniques: XY vs. ORTF

ORTF (Office de Radiodiffusion Télévision Française) is a near-coincident stereo technique that involves placing two identical mics at a specific distance from each other, with their capsules spaced 17 cm apart and angled at 110 degrees.

Unlike XY, the mics are not positioned directly next to each other, which introduces a small time delay between the sound waves reaching each mic. This delay, combined with the angle, helps create a more natural and spacious sound stage, often resembling the way our ears perceive sound in a room.

Characteristics of ORTF

The ORTF configuration produces a wider and more natural sound stage compared to the XY. The separation between the mics, along with their angling, captures more of the room’s ambiance, making it an excellent choice for environments where the acoustics play a significant role. The slight time delay between the channels adds a sense of depth and spaciousness, which can enhance the listening experience.

While this can lead to a more immersive sound, it also introduces potential phase differences, which might become noticeable if the audio is converted. Despite this, ORTF excels at providing a realistic portrayal of a live setting, making this music technology particularly effective for a large ensemble, choirs, and orchestral mixes for ambiance.

When to Use ORTF Recording?

ORTF is ideal for situations where more expansive and natural imaging is needed. This includes live performances, orchestral music, and ambient sounds. Its ability to pick up a sense of depth makes it perfect for capturing the acoustic qualities of a place, such as in a concert hall or open environment.

However, this requires more room than XY, so it might not be the best choice for small spaces or situations where portability is essential. Despite the slight possibility of phase issues, the ORTF setup remains popular for its ability to provide a lifelike stereo representation.

What Instruments can ORTF Pick Up?

ORTF excels at miking instruments and performances that benefit from natural, wide-spaced imaging with depth and spaciousness. This method is particularly effective for orchestras, choirs, and ensembles, as it captures the full spectrum of sound across the stage while maintaining a sense of the room’s ambiance. It also works well for a solo instrument such as piano and guitar. It can also work for any wind instrument, especially in settings where the acoustics of the room play a role in the overall sound.

Unlike XY, ORTF can emphasize the reverb and spread of a performance, making it ideal for recordings where a natural, live feel is desired. The method captures bass and lower frequencies effectively. When played back over speakers, ORTF recordings offer a richer and more enveloping stereo field, with sounds that feel as though they are surrounding the listener, creating a sense of presence and depth.


Are XY and ORTF Coincidental Techniques?

Comparing Stereo Recording Techniques: XY vs. ORTF

XY is a coincident stereo technique because the mics are placed so that their capsules are almost touching on an off-axis, occupying the same point. This means that sound reaches both mics simultaneously, resulting in no time differences between channels. This configuration is highly effective at reducing phasing issues, making it ideal for scenarios where the recording might need to be folded down to mono.

ORTF, however, is a near-coincident technique. While the microphones are still relatively close, they are spaced 17 cm apart and angled at 110 degrees. This introduces slight time differences between the channels, which helps create a more natural sound but also means it is more susceptible to phasing issues if converted to mono-compatible.


Choosing Between XY vs ORTF

Comparing Stereo Recording Techniques: XY vs. ORTF

When deciding between XY vs ORTF, it is essential to consider the environment, the type of sound source, and the desired stereo effect. XY offers cleaner and more controlled audio, with minimal phasing issues, making it suitable for close-miking intimate recordings. It is also convenient for situations where a compact and easy-to-set-up configuration is needed.

On the other hand, ORTF provides a wider, more natural sound with a sense of depth, making it ideal for capturing ambient sounds and live performances in environments where the room acoustics play a significant role. However, it requires more spacing and might introduce slight phase differences that could affect mono compatibility.


Final Note

Comparing Stereo Recording Techniques: XY vs. ORTF

In comparing XY vs ORTF, each offers unique strengths that make them suitable for different miking scenarios. Choosing between them often comes down to personal experience and preference, as well as the specific requirements of the environment. In the realm of music technology, understanding how each affects the audio is totally crucial and one should take note of it for a great sound stage and good imaging that one can audibly hear.


Frequently Asked Questions

Both NOS (abbreviated from the initials of the Dutch Broadcast Foundation: Nederlandse Omroep Stichting) and ORTF are near-coincident techniques that offer a wider, more natural sound compared to coincident techniques like XY. The primary difference lies in their mic spacing and angling.

NOS uses two cardioid microphones placed 30 cm apart, angled at 90 degrees. This wider spacing creates a greater time delay between the microphones, which can lead to broader audio but may introduce more pronounced phase differences. The stereo field with NOS feels open and has a realistic sense of space, but it requires careful positioning to ensure a balanced pick-up of sound sources.

ORTF, by contrast, uses a smaller 17 cm spacing with mics angled at 110 degrees. This configuration offers a slightly narrower field than NOS, but it retains a natural depth and a sense of room ambiance. You may find ORTF as a method that strikes a balance between a wide image and minimal phase discrepancies, making it more versatile for a range of recording scenarios.

While both techniques excel at capturing live performances and ensembles, ORTF’s design is more compact and can be easier to set up in smaller spaces.

The main difference between XY and spaced pair techniques for drum overheads is in how they position mics and pick up width.

The XY method places two cardioid mics close together, angled outward at around 90 degrees, creating a coincident setup. The result is a focused, centered mix that accurately represents the drum kit with minimal phase issues. This method is effective when you want a clean, balanced sound without an exaggerated spread, which can be beneficial for live recordings or smaller, intimate drum setups.

Spaced pair, also known as A/B, involves placing two mics farther apart, usually above the drum kit, with a distance that varies based on the desired spread. This method captures a much wider audio, as each mic picks up sound from different parts of the drum kit. While this pairing method can create a more immersive and spatial recording, it also introduces the risk of phase problems, especially when sounds arrive at the mics at different times. The spaced pair method is ideal for creating a sense of atmosphere, making it popular for studio recordings where a bit more pronounced effect is desired.

A stereo image refers to the perceived spatial arrangement of sound. It creates the illusion of width, depth, and distance, allowing listeners to hear sounds as if they are coming from different locations within a three-dimensional area. A well-captured stereo image will enable listeners to distinguish and hear the positioning of instruments or sound sources across the left, center, and right channels.

The center image refers to the sound that appears to be coming from the center of the stereo field, directly between the two speakers or earphones. This is typically where lead vocals, bass, and other main elements are positioned, providing a strong, focused sound that anchors the mix and one’s ears.

Having the right gear is essential. First, you need a pair of matching mics. These are the core pieces of gear that will pick up what you want and using two identical models ensures a consistent tone and response from each channel. Depending on the method you choose, like XY or ORTF, this gear could include cardioid mics or others with different polar patterns.

Another important piece of gear is a microphone bar or stand, which helps in precisely positioning the microphones. This allows you to set up configurations like coincident or near-coincident techniques accurately. Without this gear, getting the right angles and spacing would be a challenge. Additionally, you’ll need an audio interface that can handle two inputs, so make sure your gear is compatible. Many interfaces have built-in preamps, but if yours doesn’t, having external preamp gear will help boost the signals to a proper level.

Cables are also a crucial part of your gear. Quality XLR cables ensure that the signals remain clear and interference-free. It’s easy to overlook cables as gear, but they play an important role in maintaining audio integrity. Lastly, don’t forget headphones and studio monitors. This monitoring gear is necessary to listen to the mix during and after the session, letting you check for any issues.

Tags:
Ash Burnett

Hailing from Chicago, IL - Ash made his break into journalism at the age of 23 writing music reviews for a local website. Now in his late 30's and after being pulled closer towards the technical side of the music and live gig industry, he founded Shout4Music to write thorough microphone reviews.

  • 1